Yamashita Hobby 1/700 IJN “Mutsuki”,
Mutsuki class destroyer December, 1941 Kit # NV11 by Dan Kaplan |
Reviewed June 2019
Background | |||||||||||||||||||
The modern Imperial Japanese Navy battlefleet commenced with the construction of the battlecruiser Kongo in 1911, followed by Japan’s first superdreadnought, Fuso, in 1912. The initial emphasis on capital ships was both a response to an escalating naval race between the leading naval powers, and as the principal instruments of Japan’s Mahanian strategy of the decisive naval engagement. However, the concentration on capitol ships meant a minimum focus on lighter escorts. Belatedly, the Imperial General Staff, which set Japanese naval construction and design requirements, authorized new classes of first-class destroyers to augment their capital ships under their “Eight-Eight” program (modified to the “Eight -Four” program) during the latter years of WWI. The new destroyer designs emphasizing greater speed, firepower, range, and quality. Construction of the first units commenced just as the First World War approached its end. Speed was the major driving consideration as most new capital ships,
particularly the battlecruisers, were projected to feature speeds over
30 knots. Almost none of the existing Japanese destroyer designs was up
to the task. By the time the Washington Naval Disarmament Conference
of 1922 convened, three new, capable classes of destroyer had been completed
for the IJN, each an incremental improvement over the proceeding class.
The Mutsuki class of twelve ships was the last of these classes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Design | |||||||||||||||||||
Up through mid-World War 1, Japanese destroyer development had been closely linked to Royal Navy practices. As that war progressed, attention was also paid to German destroyer design. As a result, the initial class of new IJN destroyers, the Minekazes, incorporated a number of new features first seen in the German designs, including a lengthened, turtle-backed forecastle and the main armament set high on the centerline. In the new class, four, single 12cm/4.7inch gun mounts comprised the main armament, along with three sets of twin 53cm/21inch torpedo tubes. One torpedo mount was set behind the forecastle in a well deck in front of the bridge, the other two placed further aft of the funnels. More powerful, turbine driven engines for higher speed were installed, which also enabled more greater range. When completed, the new Minekazes were considered the equal of foreign contemporary destroyers. The second class of new destroyers, the Kamikazes, tweaked the original design with a strengthened bridge structure and a wider bean for greater stability. Some re-arrangement of the deckhouse and main armament occurred as well in the last few units. There were subtle tweaks to the main armament shielding as well. The Mutsukis, the last class of new destroyers, were tweaked yet again. A new bow form, referred to as a double spooned bow, was incorporated, along with more flare to help with seakeeping. Beam and draft were again slightly enlarged, better to accommodate a new, heavier torpedo armament. For the first time in a Japanese ship, 61cm/24” torpedoes were installed, in two new triple tube mounts. Reloads for six torpedoes were also provided for. More depth charges were added to the stern. Some ships were equipped with minelaying rails, while others were equipped with minesweeping paravanes. Engine machinery remained the same as the proceeding class with 38,500shp and a top speed of just over 37 knots. Range remained the same, that of 3,600nm at 14 knots. All class members underwent reconstruction between 1935 and 1937 as a result of issues with structural weaknesses exhibited by some vessels during damaging encounters with typhoons. The hull and bridge were reinforced, and the bridge reduced in width, made more aerodynamic, and given a steel roof. An RDF loop and compartment were added aft. The funnel tops were raked back and the torpedo tube mounts were enclosed by a weather and splinter proof shield. A twin 13mm AA mount aft of number two funnel was added to most units as well. Overall displacement increased, and top speed was reduced to 32.5 knots. A degaussing cable was added to the outside of the hull just prior to the beginning of hostilities in 1941. Eventually, new destroyer designs beginning with the succeeding Fubuki
type rendered the Minekaze and Kamikaze classes obsolete by the mid-1930s.
Most of these ships were subsequently assigned secondary duties. The enlarged
and improved torpedo batteries of the Mutsukis were seen as an asset, and
these ships were retained as first line ships at the outset of the Pacific
war.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Brief History | |||||||||||||||||||
Mutsuki (January Moon) was laid down at the Sasebo Naval Dockyard as Destroyer #19 on May, 21, 1924. She was launched on July 23, 1925 and completed on March 25, 1926. After commissioning, she became flagship of the 30th Destroyer Division. She was renamed Mutsuki in 1928. Mutsuki was heavily damaged in the 4th Fleet Incident of Sept, 1935, when she and many other ships encountered a severe typhoon. Her bridge face was completely smashed, her captain killed, and the ship lost steering. Thankfully, emergency steering was quickly restored and the ship saved. She subsequently underwent reconstruction and modernization. Afterwards, Mutsuki and DesDiv 30 participated in numerous landings and provided fire support during various operations in Chinese coastal waters in the late 1930s. She was active from the outset of the Pacific war, participating in the invasions of Wake Island, the Solomon Islands, Rabaul, New Ireland, New Britain, Lae, Salamua, and the Shortland Islands; all by the end of April, 1942. Sprinkled among the invasions was a number of convoy escort missions in conjunction with her division. Of note was a brief period of maintenance at Truk, where she had a small sponson added forward of her bridge and a twin 13mm mount added on the starboard side. In May, she and DesDiv 30 escorted the troop convoy tasked with the invasion of Port Moresby as part of Operation MO. However, the concurrent Battle of the Coral Sea stymied that intent. The invasion was postponed after the clash, as the withdrawal of the IJN’s carrier force eliminated air cover for the invasion force. Without air cover, the convoy was now clearly vulnerable to enemy air attack and ordered to return to base at Rabaul. Afterwards, there was a lull in activity, save for some new escort missions. Eventually, in late June, Mutsuki escorted a ship loaded with a construction battalion to Tulagi in the Solomon Islands, across from Guadalcanal, in order to begin construction of an airfield. She then reported to Sasebo Naval Base in mid-July for a refit and maintenance, which was completed by mid-August. While there, the division was re-assigned to Eighth Fleet, newly created to support operations around Guadalcanal and New Guinea. After completion of the refit, Mutsuki and DesDiv 30 joined those forces at Rabaul and the Shortland Islands. In early August, US forces had invaded Guadalcanal, and 8th Fleet became the focus of Japanese naval efforts to dislodge the Americans. On the evening of August 24th, Mutsuki joined division-mate Yayoi and three other destroyers in bombarding the newly established, American-held airfield known as Henderson Field on Guadalcanal. This happened to be one of the initial actions that were part of what became known as the Battle of the Eastern Solomons. Elsewhere, opposing forces had engaged this same day in a series of damaging carrier actions, with both sides subsequently withdrawing their carrier forces from the scene. On the following morning of the 25th, Mutsuki and her bombardment companions were made part of a large cruiser and destroyer escort to a small troop reinforcement convoy commanded by Rear Admiral Raizo Tanaka. The convoy itself was composed of three transports and several patrol boats, all carrying men to be landed on Guadalcanal. However, the bombardment of Henderson Field by Mutsuki and her consorts the night before had been mostly ineffective, leaving American air power based on the field mostly intact. Several of those aircraft subsequently attacked the convoy and its escorts during mid-morning, damaging both the convoy flagship, CL Jintsu, and one of the transports. Mutsuki pulled alongside the damaged transport Kinryu Maru to take off her crew and embarked troops. It was then that four US Army Air Force B-17s from Espiritu Santo arrived
overhead and proceed to make a bomb run over the two motionless ships.
Mutsuki’s captain elected to keep his ship alongside Kinryu Maru to continue
the evacuation. Several bombs hit on or around the ships, with at least
one direct hit in Mutsuki’s engineering spaces. She quickly sank, with
41 dead (including the captain) and 11 injured. Division sister Yayoi took
off her survivors as well as those of Kinryu Maru. After scuttling the
transport with a torpedo, Yayoi took the survivors back to base in the
Shortland Islands.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The Kit | |||||||||||||||||||
Yamashita Hobby has now chosen to release a second IJN
destroyer class whose current kits leave some room for improvement. Hasegawa
issued the first 1/700 Mutsuki class kits as part of the initial Waterline
-Consortium line-up in the early 1970s. There were two variants, an as-built
version (Mikazuki) and a modernized version (Mutsuki).
Personally, I always thought these to be very good efforts for 1970s era kits. Though the superstructure and deckhouse are simplified and erroneous (particularly around the funnels), and despite a mix of fits represented within a single kit, the basic shapes and scale are pretty well done. The overall molding is generally sharp, the bow edge is fine and its profile is very good. Perhaps most impressive was the scaling of the main battery, particularly the shields, which is correct, even if it’s devoid of detailing. The bridge superstructure is certainly passable, and the box art for Mutsuki is notable as well. Dimensionally, the kit was decent, if perhaps 2mm too long. Some 30+ years later, Pit-Road offered its own take on the class, beginning in 2008. Since then, they’ve issued a couple of different class members in early, mid and late war fits, some with the full hull option. Far more detailed and accurate in many ways over the Hasegawa versions, these newer kits still have some drawbacks. Most disconcerting is the scale of the 12cm/4.7inch main battery, particularly the shields for the gun. It’s clearly oversized and makes the ship look awkward and top-heavy. The bow profile is also a bit exaggerated. Dimensionally, the waterline length is 1mm too long, while the overall length was correct. This discrepancy produces a bow profile that is a little off, in that the protrusion of the lower bow forward is more pronounced that necessary. A small point, to be sure, but one that does catch the eye. Yamashita Hobby has evidently decided to address the more outstanding discrepancies of these kits with its own, new Mutsuki class kit. The kit is molded in a light grey plastic with uniformly sharp detailing. It is a waterline version only; no full hull option is available. There are 13 sprues and approximately 180 pieces, though not all are used. Dimensions and the scale of the main armament are the most notable of the improvements. It’s marketed as Mutsuki, late 1941; right out of the box, this kit
can be built as any of the first eight sisters (those with mine rails)
after modernization. The fit is either immediately prior to or at
the outset of the war, though the kit does not provide a degaussing cable
on the hull.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Hull Sprue (MT-1) | |||||||||||||||||||
This holds the main hull, which is split into halves and is strictly a waterline presentation. It’s cleanly molded with very sharp details, including portholes, porthole eyebrows, properly shaped anchor recesses, and subtle raised seam lines for plating. There are no subtle depressions or sinkholes. As stated, there is no degaussing cable, so the kit can be built in immediate pre-war mode, or one can add a degaussing cable for a wartime fit. | |||||||||||||||||||
The “double spoon” bow profile is excellent, with the bottom portion jutting forward of the vertical axis by just a hair. The sprue tree is attached to the leading edge of the bow from the inside of the hull so as to retain the bow’s subtle profile and fineness. Care must be taken to remove it; preferably by shaving the attachment point from the inside out. | |||||||||||||||||||
While the inside of the hull halves has an inset lip to hold a hidden bottom plate, it has also been engineered to accept a more substantial bottom plate assembly in order to combat any inadvertent bending of the hull and to keep it flat. More on that in a moment. | |||||||||||||||||||
The kit hull dimensions scale out particularly well:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Sprue MT-2 | |||||||||||||||||||
This sprue carries the main deck, the forecastle deck, the bridge wings, the sides and main armament bandstands of the aft deckhouse, a third bandstand, and the treaded roof of the RDF compartment. These pieces are superbly detailed, scaled and sharply molded, particularly the decks. This particular main deck configuration carries the mine rails aft, so the eligible sisters include: Mutsuki, Kisaragi, Yayoi, Uzuki, Satsuki, Minazuki, Fumizuki, and Nagatsuki. | |||||||||||||||||||
Sprue MT-3 | |||||||||||||||||||
A smaller sprue, this one contains: a 6.5m motor launch, bridge windows insert, several air intakes, port & starboard navigation light boxes, anchors, jackstaffs, and a 75cm searchlight. All parts are crisply formed and scaled. | |||||||||||||||||||
Sprue MT-5 | |||||||||||||||||||
This sprue holds the funnel halves for both funnels, the funnel grills, the main components of the bridge, the halves of the RDF compartment, the compass bridge deck and roof, and some further components that make up the various deckhouses. The detailing is very good, though, of course, a photoetch funnel grill is always preferable to plastic. | |||||||||||||||||||
Sprue MT-6 | |||||||||||||||||||
A small structures sprue, this one contains the fore and mainmasts,
the funnel galley pipe and other auxiliary piping, all of the torpedo storage
bays, the trestles that support the main mount bandstands, the maneuvering
light affixed to the main mast, a crow’s nest for the foremast, and a torpedo
reload gantry.
Again, everything shows really nice detailing. There are PE alternatives
for the trestles, if one so desires.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Sprue MT-G x 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
This is the main armament sprue. It supplies two different versions
of the 12cm/45 Third Year Type naval gun, two different Type G shields
for same, single depth charge throwers and small depth charge racks for
same, davits for the ship’s boats, a 6m cutter, and air intakes.
Only one type of gun and shield is used, designated parts 1 & 2.
The unused parts appear to be the earlier shield and breech block/housing
used aboard the Minekaze class ships.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Sprue WL MT-2 | |||||||||||||||||||
With this unique bottom plate, Yamashita Hobby takes a more proactive approach to keeping a waterline hull flat. Essentially, it enforces hull stiffness by adding a raised, lengthwise ridge along the top of the flat bottom plate. It resembles an upside down “T” in cross-section, along with some bulked-up attachment points along the hull and within the bow. I did not test fit it, but it certainly seems like it could do the job. | |||||||||||||||||||
YH700P6 x2 | |||||||||||||||||||
This is a small sprue of deck accessories and is carried over unchanged
from the Fubuki class kits. It’s also available for separate sale as a
winch reel set. Each includes three sizes of hawser reels, two deck winches,
and several sizes of both regular and storm mushroom vents.
As I have stated in earlier YH reviews, the scale and sizing of these
pieces continues to be smaller and finer than anything previously offered
in styrene, and rivals some offerings available in brass or 3D printing.
For anyone who ever chiseled off the molded-on deck reels on the waterline
kits and then wondered why all the better detailed replacements seemed
so oversized, the answer is that, until these were released in 2015, no
one was willing, or able, to mold them small enough to be in scale with
any reasonable detail. This is a great set of fittings.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
YH700P7, Y700C and Y700E | |||||||||||||||||||
This sprue is also a carryover from the YH Fubuki class kits, though,
in those kits, it’s made of clear plastic. Here, it’s comprised of plain
grey styrene. Included are port and starboard running lights, a 90cm
searchlight and four 30cm signal lights (you only need two of them). Once
again, everything is to scale, which means these pieces are carpet monster
eligible. I will say that the FineMolds version of the 90cm searchlight
is still more detailed.
The YH700C & YH700E sprues are not used in this kit. I don’t know
why they weren’t clipped off before packing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
YH700T4 x2 | |||||||||||||||||||
This is the torpedo battery sprue and it’s carried over unchanged from
Yamashita Hobby’s Fubuki class kits. The two classes shared some equipment,
particularly the Type 90 61cm/24” diameter torpedoes and triple shielded
mounts. Included on this sprue are the triple torpedo tube housings, mounts,
and tubes, boat davits, torpedo and depth charge davits, a depth charge
rack, a Y-thrower for the depth charges, ship’s 7m cutters, single 13mm
AAs, anchors, depth charge, a 12.7cm practice loader, and rangefinders.
The breakdown and detail of the torpedo tubes is on a par with, to the
Fubuki class version issued by Pit-Road with its NE07 equipment set. It’s
also comparable to similar Finemolds accessories. Most everything is sharply
defined. The practice loader is a little tall, but’s it’s also sized as
a 12.7cm mount, not a 12cm mount.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Much of the equipment on the sprue is designed for the Fubukis, so several pieces are not utilized in this kit, including the anchors, boats, davits, depth charge rack and Y-thrower. Coupled with the fact that two such sprues are provided, there’s a lot of good stuff for the spares box. This set is also available for individual sale as a small vessel equipment set from YH. | |||||||||||||||||||
Decals | |||||||||||||||||||
None are included, just as with the Yamashita Hobby Fubuki Type kits. I suppose it helps keep the kit’s cost down. Fortunately, there are several aftermarket alternatives, particularly for flags. Pit-Road also makes a decal sheet with katakana lettering for sides of the hull, for those interested in detailing a pre-war version. YH has released a similar katakana sheet for its own Fubuki kits, and it’s not unreasonable to expect such a sheet for their Mutsuki class kits, assuming that YH continues to roll variants out. | |||||||||||||||||||
Instructions | |||||||||||||||||||
These are in Japanese and handled in the typical format.
They consist of one large sheet printed front and back, then folded into
several panels. The front panel portrays the usual black & white reprint
of the cover art; a second panel has plan and line drawing views keyed
to Mr. Color callouts for painting, and is paired with the sprue/parts
breakdown. The rest of the sheets have a step-by-step progression of assembly
using exploded, three-point perspective illustrations.
The sprue marking system continues to a little confusing, as some sprues are marked by similar letters or numbers. Yamashita did take care to list the sprue number next to every part number, which helps greatly to eliminate confusion. Cross-checking the sprues with the sprue/parts list in the instructions will be helpful in keeping things straight. There are different prefixes in Japanese marked on the instructions, but that’s not particularly helpful to those who don’t read Japanese. Still, it’s not rocket science, and the correct parts can be ascertained by paying close attention to the assembly portion of the instructions. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Final thoughts | |||||||||||||||||||
Yamashita’s new Mutsuki class kit is a welcome correction to the earlier Mutsuki class kits. The bow shows a set of properly proportioned curves, the main armament is properly scaled, and the overall detailing is sharp and crisp. The revised waterline plate promises to eliminate the hull bowing seen in earlier YH kits. The fit remains to be seen, but I suspect that it will be very good and I would anticipate a really nice build right out of the box. Highly recommended. | |||||||||||||||||||
This kit comes courtesy of my wallet. I don’t see this kit currently offered for sale by US distributors, but the cost at Hobbylink Japan is approximately US$12.25, plus shipping. |